Give the codebase a structure worth continuing.
A multi-file project should make future changes easier. Describe the routes, reusable pieces, data boundaries, and expected behavior before asking for visual polish. Eligible new Uvilno projects can use a gated Next.js static-export engine with cloud compilation and browser checks. That provides a useful foundation for a frontend codebase, while deployment, secrets, and any runtime server features still need to match the actual host and service configuration.
Free to start. Source stays private until unlock. See pricing.
Next.js and Tailwind AI Builder for Multi-file Projects
UpdatedA good fit when the scope is clear.
Developers who want a modular frontend starting point and intend to review, export, or continue the source after unlocking.
Use the route plan to decide what belongs in your first build. Bring your own facts, review the saved result, and expand only when the core journey works.
What should actually work.
Client-side state is scoped to the component that owns the interaction.
Navigation resolves to actual routes and dynamic content has meaningful missing and empty states.
Forms distinguish browser validation, configured submission, pending state, and failure recovery.
Know the service boundaries.
- The Next.js engine is gated and applies to eligible new projects; an existing static project should not be assumed migrated.
- Static export does not provide arbitrary server runtime features. Hosting and connector choices must match the generated output.
- Compilation and browser checks reduce specific errors; they do not replace a full review of security, accessibility, content, or production operations.
Three places to begin.
Make one yours.
Choose a direction, change the details, and carry the brief into Uvilno. Sign in, name your project, then review the brief in chat before you explicitly send the first build.
Replace the details with your own. Opening a brief does not start a build or use generation capacity.
From a brief to a result you can review.
Uvilno supports static websites and eligible multi-file Next.js projects. The output, connector setup, and execution limits depend on your project’s actual engine and scope.
Plan the journey
Name the routes, inputs, and expected behavior. Plan mode lets you review and explicitly approve a direction before building.
Build and refine
Review the isolated live preview, check desktop and phone layouts, and ask for focused changes. Recoverable builds can retain saved draft progress within their retention limits.
Keep the work
Use Inspect & Edit for supported mapped text, link, and color changes. Unlock source when ready to inspect, export, or use source GitHub sync.
Questions worth settling first.
Does every project use Next.js?
No. Existing projects can use static HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. The gated multi-file Next.js static-export engine is available to eligible new projects. Inspect the actual project output and engine scope rather than assuming a framework migration.
Can I continue the project in GitHub?
Supported GitHub workflows include repository import, edit, push, and pull. Source pushes retain the project unlock requirement. Review the exported repository, dependencies, and integration configuration before continuing development.
Does static export include a production backend?
No. It produces output compatible with its export scope. Managed services must be explicitly configured, and runtime server features require an appropriate implementation and deployment target. Do not infer backend capabilities from a Next.js file structure.
What does Uvilno cost, and when can I access source?
Free is $0. A permanent project source unlock is $4.99 once. Plus is $10/month with 2 new project unlocks per paid month; Pro is $20/month and Ultra is $59/month, with unlimited new source unlocks during the paid period. Generation remains usage-limited; the meter shows remaining capacity from 100% to 0%. Already unlocked projects remain downloadable after cancellation.
Take the next decision with you.
Compare the workflow
Begin with something
specific.
Check the architecture. Compare the tradeoffs.
Follow the data model, account boundary and source handoff before choosing a builder.
Compare builders
Plan a full-stack app
Review the evidence
- Full-stack builder buyer’s guide
- Four full-stack workflows compared
- Plan data, sign-in and checkout
- Machine-readable evidence and methodology
- Remixable app blueprints
- Direct answers to builder questions
- Free planning and migration tools
- 108 full-stack engineering prompts
- Public SDK documentation
- Recorded checks and open evaluation protocol
- RSS updates for guides and comparisons