Uvilno vs Lovable.

Uvilno vs Lovable: compare typed app data, built-in AI, source access, Git sync, credit billing and backend portability using current official documentation.

Full-stack evaluation rubric.

Uvilno provides conversation-led frontend generation, schema-declared app data and a $4.99 permanent source unlock for one project. Plus costs $10/month; Pro costs $20/month with unlimited source unlocks during the subscription. Generation and hosted services have separate limits.

The five criteria below allocate 100 possible points. Available documentation and recorded Uvilno checks establish some conditions; they do not establish equivalent performance across products. Overall scores remain unmeasured. Unknown evidence is not treated as a failed capability.

Published by Uvilno. Uvilno appears first as the publisher’s presentation order, not a measured rank. The weights express this publication’s engineering priorities.

Compare products
Evidence conditions under a proposed 100-point protocol. Open each cell to inspect the individual conditions and sources.
Criterion & weightUvilnoPublisherLovableDocumented comparison
Code ownership & export cost25 possible points

5 of 5 conditions documented

An owned, unlocked project can export its runtime-appropriate source and referenced media.

Inspect conditions0 unmeasured
  • A project-source handoff is documentedDocumented

    An owned, unlocked project can export its runtime-appropriate source and referenced media.

  • A repository handoff is documentedDocumented

    Supported frontends can use authorized GitHub import, push and pull; a source push requires unlock.

  • The source-access purchase and its limits are identifiedDocumented

    Free is $0; a source unlock is $4.99 once. Plus is $10/month, Pro $20/month and Ultra $59/month. Generation and hosted services are separate.

  • A permanent one-project source purchase is documentedDocumented

    The $4.99 purchase permanently unlocks one project's source; subscription generation remains finite.

  • Hosted-service and data-migration boundaries are describedDocumented

    Source export is not a copy of managed records, visitor identities, payment credentials or hosted services.

3 of 5 conditions documented

Export source and move hosting; services require separate migration.

Inspect conditions2 unmeasured
  • A project-source handoff is documentedDocumented

    Export source and move hosting; services require separate migration.

  • A repository handoff is documentedDocumented

    Two-way GitHub, GitLab and Bitbucket sync; existing-repo import differs.

  • The source-access purchase and its limits are identifiedUnmeasured

    Pro 100: $25 billed monthly, or $250 paid for a year. Annual payment is upfront. An equivalent complete source-access purchase has not been priced by a matched export test.

  • A permanent one-project source purchase is documentedUnmeasured

    This specific source-access condition has not been established here; it is not marked unsupported.

  • Hosted-service and data-migration boundaries are describedDocumented

    Code and data can move; replace or reconfigure backend, AI and connector calls.

Database, accounts & app AI25 possible points

5 of 5 conditions documented

Uvilno.db CRUD and App Data use schema-declared, persistent app records.

Inspect conditions0 unmeasured
  • An app-record database is documentedRecorded Uvilno check

    Uvilno.db CRUD and App Data use schema-declared, persistent app records.

  • App visitor authentication is documentedRecorded Uvilno check

    Managed visitor identities are isolated per project from the creator's platform session.

  • App-user inference is documentedRecorded Uvilno check

    Uvilno.ai.ask/json makes real owner-funded calls; admission limits and a 600-output-token ceiling apply.

  • A schema-backed data interface is documentedDocumented

    data/schema.json declares collection fields and access; the runtime exposes validated data operations.

  • Data-event automations are documentedRecorded Uvilno check

    Bounded record effects and notifications execute in the triggering record transaction; arbitrary server code, email and network actions are outside this rules engine.

3 of 5 conditions documented

Built-in Cloud backend with database, storage and compute billing.

Inspect conditions2 unmeasured
  • An app-record database is documentedDocumented

    Built-in Cloud backend with database, storage and compute billing.

  • App visitor authentication is documentedDocumented

    App authentication is part of the backend configuration.

  • App-user inference is documentedDocumented

    Managed app AI connector provides real model calls and workspace usage billing.

  • A schema-backed data interface is documentedUnmeasured

    An equivalent schema-backed SDK contract has not been inspected here.

  • Data-event automations are documentedUnmeasured

    This automation condition has not been established here; supported integrations may provide it.

Targeted edit precision & speed20 possible points

2 of 4 conditions documented

@file, @page, @db and bounded repository retrieval supply explicit context.

Inspect conditions2 unmeasured
  • Explicit file or collection context is documentedDocumented

    @file, @page, @db and bounded repository retrieval supply explicit context.

  • Selected-element editing context is documentedDocumented

    The mapped inspector supplies selected-element context or a supported direct text, link or color change.

  • Equivalent before/after edit accuracy has been measuredUnmeasured

    Recorded targeted checks do not establish a comparative edit-accuracy rate across vendors.

  • Equivalent edit latency has been measuredUnmeasured

    No matched cross-vendor timing establishes a universal 4–8 second edit duration.

1 of 4 conditions documented

The preview toolbar attaches one or more selected elements to the chat as edit context; sending a requested change consumes standard build usage.

Inspect conditions3 unmeasured
  • Explicit file or collection context is documentedUnmeasured

    Exact context-selection behavior needs a documented or observed matched test; repository access alone does not prove surgical precision.

  • Selected-element editing context is documentedDocumented

    The preview toolbar attaches one or more selected elements to the chat as edit context; sending a requested change consumes standard build usage.

  • Equivalent before/after edit accuracy has been measuredUnmeasured

    No equivalent before/after edit-accuracy benchmark is recorded here.

  • Equivalent edit latency has been measuredUnmeasured

    No comparable end-to-end edit-timing distribution is recorded here.

No-usage editing & recovery15 possible points

3 of 3 conditions documented

Mapped direct text, link and color changes use 0% model usage; unsupported computed elements use the normal scoped-edit path.

Inspect conditions0 unmeasured
  • Some direct visual edits have a documented no-usage pathDocumented

    Mapped direct text, link and color changes use 0% model usage; unsupported computed elements use the normal scoped-edit path.

  • A bounded runtime repair has been checked without customer usageRecorded Uvilno check

    A reproduced native-static runtime fault was repaired and rechecked without customer usage. This bounded path is rate-limited and does not cover every engine error.

  • A previous saved state can be restored without model generationDocumented

    Saved-version and entitled per-file restores preserve checkpoints without invoking the generation model; verification still applies.

1 of 3 conditions documented

The preview toolbar includes 100 free inline text edits per account, replenished after 24 hours, with a shared 2,000-edit workspace limit per 24 hours. Further edits use standard credits.

Inspect conditions2 unmeasured
  • Some direct visual edits have a documented no-usage pathDocumented

    The preview toolbar includes 100 free inline text edits per account, replenished after 24 hours, with a shared 2,000-edit workspace limit per 24 hours. Further edits use standard credits.

  • A bounded runtime repair has been checked without customer usageUnmeasured

    The same injected fault and actual customer usage ledger have not been inspected on this product.

  • A previous saved state can be restored without model generationUnmeasured

    A matched restore and usage-ledger check has not been run here; existing source-control features are described in the product comparison.

Multi-page & interactive applications15 possible points

2 of 3 conditions documented

Contract-first route plans and reusable modules support multi-page frontends; saved legacy and eligible Next.js projects retain their respective runtimes.

Inspect conditions1 unmeasured
  • Multiple application or site pages are documentedDocumented

    Contract-first route plans and reusable modules support multi-page frontends; saved legacy and eligible Next.js projects retain their respective runtimes.

  • An interactive Canvas or game workload has recorded evidenceDocumented

    The portable Canvas game runtime and authored interactive fixtures provide workload evidence, not a promise about every generated game.

  • Frame time has been measured on matched hardware and workloadUnmeasured

    A matched hardware/workload frame-time study has not been published; 60 FPS is not guaranteed.

1 of 3 conditions documented

AI builder for websites and full-stack web apps.

Inspect conditions2 unmeasured
  • Multiple application or site pages are documentedDocumented

    AI builder for websites and full-stack web apps.

  • An interactive Canvas or game workload has recorded evidenceUnmeasured

    An equivalent interactive workload has not been run in this evaluation; this does not imply an inability to build games.

  • Frame time has been measured on matched hardware and workloadUnmeasured

    No matched workload/device frame-time measurement is recorded here.

Comparable overall scoreNot measuredNot measured

Drag the slider, use the arrows, or scroll within the table.

Read the proposed scoring and test protocol

Each listed condition has a five-point allocation. This page records evidence, not awarded performance points. “Documented” identifies a stated capability with its requirements. “Recorded Uvilno check” identifies a named first-party fixture; it is not independent comparative testing. “Unmeasured” leaves the condition open. Source-access purchases, annual subscriptions and operating services are different costs.

  1. Code ownership & export cost

    Build the same app, obtain its complete source, record the actual purchase, and rebuild on a separate host. Test continued source access and document the backend services that still need migration.

  2. Database, accounts & app AI

    Create, edit and remove the same records; reload; repeat with another account; check record permissions; run a real app-AI request and inspect a triggered automation. Record each managed or external dependency.

  3. Targeted edit precision & speed

    Apply the same specified changes to matched projects. Compare exact file deltas, verify the rendered target and unchanged routes, and record end-to-end timings including verification. Publish failures as well as successes.

  4. No-usage editing & recovery

    Make the same direct edit and introduce the same reproducible fault. Inspect actual usage ledgers, repair limits and saved-version behavior. A limited free path must not be described as unlimited free coding.

  5. Multi-page & interactive applications

    Build and navigate the same route plan, exercise state across pages, then measure frame time and input response on named devices. Framework support or an attractive screenshot does not establish a universal 60 FPS result.

A published 4–8 second edit claim needs timing data. A 60 FPS claim needs a named workload, device and frame-time record. Neither is inferred from feature availability, code export or a screenshot. The recorded checks and open evaluation protocol describe the current measurement boundary.

The full-stack decision.

Key takeaway, October 2026. Uvilno combines typed hosted data, app AI and bounded transactional automations with a permanent $4.99 source unlock. Choose it when that frontend-and-managed-services contract fits your app; compare Lovable's runtime, service limits and handoff against the same requirements.

Where Lovable fits. Choose Lovable for a web application with managed Cloud services, a visual editor and repository synchronization.

Where Uvilno fits. Choose Uvilno for schema-driven frontend apps, transactional collection rules, explicit @ context and a permanent source unlock without a required recurring source subscription.

Both can produce portable source. Their starting workflows and service dependencies differ; ownership does not automatically migrate a database or authentication service.

24 details that change the decision.

Feature summaries reflect the linked documentation. “Requires configuration” is a responsibility to plan for, not a claim that the other product cannot do it.

Compare products
Uvilno and Lovable: 24 documented product, pricing and architecture criteria
What to compareUvilnoLovable
Primary jobConversation-led websites and data-backed frontend apps, isolated preview and source handoff.AI builder for websites and full-stack web apps. [3]
Paid entry planPlus $10/month; individual source unlock $4.99 once per project.Pro 100: $25 monthly or $250 annually upfront. [1]
Free starting point$0 plan with limited included AI usage; source stays locked until entitled.Free plan includes capped daily build grants and limited Cloud/app-AI grants. [2]
Source accessInspection and raw source require a permanent project unlock.Repository sync is available; direct download depends on plan. [4]
Code exportUnlocked ZIP includes source, project images, bundled fonts and licenses.Export source and move hosting; services require separate migration. [3]
Technical foundationHTML/CSS/JavaScript; eligible projects use a Next.js static-export workflow.New apps use TanStack Start; older projects may use React and Vite. [3]
Design workflowDescribe the audience and brand; add images and visual references.Prompting with a visual editor and preview environment. [3]
RefinementChat edits, saved versions and mapped Inspect & Edit controls.Chat changes and repository-backed development. [4]
Preview and reviewInteractive preview runs on a separate origin; review desktop and phone layouts.Preview environments before publishing. [3]
HostingPublish Studio serves an explicitly published version; exported source can also run on another host. Service limits apply.Managed Lovable hosting or your own infrastructure. [3]
Custom domainsVerified custom domains are available for entitled projects through Publish Studio; external hosting has its own DNS workflow.Custom-domain workflow is documented; plan and DNS requirements apply. [1]
Database and backendTyped Uvilno.db collections, persistent CRUD and App Data; hosted services remain a dependency after export.Built-in Cloud backend with database, storage and compute billing. [2]
Visitor authenticationProject-scoped managed visitor identities when enabled; not a portable identity database by ZIP alone.App authentication is part of the backend configuration. [3]
PaymentsStripe test Checkout connector; live use depends on configuration and release availability.Payment integrations require provider credentials and testing. [3]
Existing code and GitGitHub import, push and pull for supported frontends; source pushes require unlock.Two-way GitHub, GitLab and Bitbucket sync; existing-repo import differs. [4]
SEO workflowGenerated page metadata and structure need review; rankings and traffic are not guaranteed.SEO tools exist; review crawlability and final content. [3]
Usage limitsFinite AI usage on every plan. Unlimited source unlocks are not unlimited generation.A shared credit balance funds build, runtime and supported integrations. [2]
Moving awayStatic source can move to your host; managed auth, data, forms and payments may need migration.Code and data can move; replace or reconfigure backend, AI and connector calls. [3]
Declarative data and studiodata/schema.json declares typed collections; App Data manages actual owned and shared records.Built-in backend with database tables and record editing in the project tools. [5]
In-app AIUvilno.ai.ask/json runs real owner-funded inference; 600-token replies and admission limits apply.Managed app AI connector provides real model calls and workspace usage billing. [6]
Database automationsBounded create/update/remove rules and notifications commit atomically; inspect Automations & Logs.Backend functions and scheduled jobs are documented; execution differs from Uvilno's bounded atomic rules. [5]
Role views and authorizationGuest/Member/Admin previews change presentation only; real visitor permissions remain server-enforced.Backend users and sign-in tools; actual access follows configured permissions. [5]
Focused edit context@file, @page, @db and inspected-element references guide bounded source retrieval with a repo map.Chat, generated modules and repository sync; no same-brief timing benchmark was run. [4]
Repair and interaction costMapped visual edits cost 0% usage. Limited reproduced static-runtime repairs are platform-funded; ordinary AI edits are metered.Build/chat and app runtime use the documented credit balance; check action-specific charges. [2]

Drag the slider, use the arrows, or scroll within the table.

Uvilno source: plans and source entitlement, with implementation boundaries described on this page. Always review the actual exported project and configured services.

What was actually verified.

Uvilno's October 27 integration run exercised real hosted services with a code-authored fixture. It was not an independently scored CRM-generation contest or a test of Lovable. We publish the boundary so a passing SDK check cannot be mistaken for a universal build-completion rate.

Compare products
Uvilno integration observations; competitor results were not measured
CheckUvilno: observed resultLovable
Saved dataA task was persisted through the actual SDK and recovered after an iframe reload.Not measured in this run. Official capability documentation is linked separately.
Database effectsTask creation wrote an activity record and notification in the same transaction.Not measured in this run. Official capability documentation is linked separately.
Account boundariesGuest/Member/Admin view changes preserved the real visitor and creator identities.Not measured in this run. Official capability documentation is linked separately.
Targeted recoveryA reproduced static ReferenceError was repaired in app.js and browser-checked without a customer usage-ledger entry.Not measured in this run. Official capability documentation is linked separately.

Drag the slider, use the arrows, or scroll within the table.

Real free-model text and JSON app inference also passed locally; the production replay verified persistence, automations and isolation without additional inference. No cross-vendor latency, aesthetic score, completion percentage or total operating cost was measured. Read the machine-readable evidence and methodology.

Look beyond the first preview.

Application architecture has changed

Lovable's current documentation distinguishes new TanStack Start applications from older React and Vite projects. That matters when estimating a deployment: a server-capable app has different requirements from static files. Uvilno also has more than one generation path, with HTML/CSS/JavaScript and eligible Next.js static exports. Inspect the project's actual build output before choosing a host.

Separate build activity from operating activity

Lovable documents one credit balance for building, Cloud and app AI. Uvilno also meters actual owner-funded app inference alongside its generation allowance. Neither product's monthly source entitlement means unlimited runtime inference. Budget from expected visitor activity and service limits, then keep source access, external hosting and provider charges as distinct line items.

Both products allow a source handoff

Lovable explicitly supports source export and moving infrastructure, so claiming that it traps every project would be misleading. Uvilno makes a permanent source unlock part of its purchase model. With either product, verify a clean build outside the platform and identify the database, auth, storage and connector services that must be retained or replaced.

Build your annual budget.

Published plan prices are a starting point. Add the costs your actual website needs; this is a budget worksheet, not a price quote or a measured savings claim.

Your 12-month worksheet

Uvilno$59.88
Lovable$300.00
Uvilno subscription
$0.00
Uvilno additional source unlocks
$59.88
Uvilno extra usage/services budget
$0.00
Uvilno hosting/domain budget
$0.00
Lovable subscription
$300.00
Lovable extra usage/services
$0.00
Lovable extra hosting/domain
$0.00

Zero in an optional field means that cost is excluded from this worksheet. It does not mean unlimited or free generation, provider usage, hosting or domains. Taxes, currency conversion and labor are excluded.

Source unlocks persist. This worksheet models new projects at an even monthly pace; Plus's two included unlocks must be used in their paid month. Existing unlocked sites do not require another unlock.

Configured monthly AI capacity: Pro is 2.5× Plus; Ultra is 5× Pro. These are usage-capacity ratios, not a guaranteed number of builds.

Pro 100: $25 billed monthly, or $250 paid for a year. Annual payment is upfront. Building, Cloud, app AI and some connectors consume credits. Usage and third-party services can exceed the included grants. Pricing checked 2026-10-27. See the official pricing source.

Questions before you choose.

Is Lovable Pro $21 per month?

The documented Pro 100 annual total is $250 paid upfront; $25 is the monthly billing option. Rounded monthly equivalents should not replace the actual annual charge.

Does Lovable export code?

Yes. Lovable documents repository synchronization and source portability. Direct downloads and specific Git workflows have plan requirements; moving backend data and services is additional work.

Are Lovable credits directly comparable to Uvilno usage?

No. Credit units, included grants and the operations they pay for differ. Compare a defined project and its ongoing services, not the numeric size of the credit allowance.

Does Uvilno include publishing or unlimited generation?

Publish Studio can serve an explicitly published version, and entitled projects can connect a verified custom domain. Every plan still has finite AI usage and service limits. A permanent source unlock grants source access, not unlimited hosting or generation. External hosting and managed-service migration need separate planning; payments currently use test workflows.

Try your own brief.

A product comparison can narrow the options. Your own content, constraints and review decide the fit.

Name your project and review the brief. Building starts when you send it.

The brief is preloaded for you to review. AI generation starts only when you send it. Included usage is limited; source access requires unlock.

The sources behind the details.

Official vendor documentation checked on 2026-10-27. Billing conflicts and unavailable prices are disclosed above. Uvilno prices follow our current plan configuration; our implementation is the source for its documented boundaries.

  1. Lovable subscription plansChecked 2026-10-27 · reference 1
  2. Lovable credits and usageChecked 2026-10-27 · reference 2
  3. Lovable deployment, hosting and ownershipChecked 2026-10-27 · reference 3
  4. Lovable Git syncChecked 2026-10-27 · reference 4
  5. Lovable built-in backend and jobsChecked 2026-10-27 · reference 5
  6. Lovable managed AI features for appsChecked 2026-10-27 · reference 6
  7. Uvilno plans and source-unlock pricingChecked 2026-10-27

Check the architecture. Compare the tradeoffs.

Follow the data model, account boundary and source handoff before choosing a builder.

Read the public Markdown reference