Uvilno vs Base44: compare typed app data, auth, built-in AI, workflows, GitHub source handoff and the difference between a $4.99 unlock and recurring app hosting.
Uvilno provides conversation-led frontend generation, schema-declared app data and a $4.99 permanent source unlock for one project. Plus costs $10/month; Pro costs $20/month with unlimited source unlocks during the subscription. Generation and hosted services have separate limits.
The five criteria below allocate 100 possible points. Available documentation and recorded Uvilno checks establish some conditions; they do not establish equivalent performance across products. Overall scores remain unmeasured. Unknown evidence is not treated as a failed capability.
Published by Uvilno. Uvilno appears first as the publisher’s presentation order, not a measured rank. The weights express this publication’s engineering priorities.
Compare products
Evidence conditions under a proposed 100-point protocol. Open each cell to inspect the individual conditions and sources.
The source-access purchase and its limits are identifiedUnmeasured
Starter is displayed at $16/month billed annually ($192 upfront). Builder, which lists GitHub integration, is $40/month billed annually ($480 upfront). An equivalent complete source-access purchase has not been priced by a matched export test.
A permanent one-project source purchase is documentedUnmeasured
This specific source-access condition has not been established here; it is not marked unsupported.
Hosted-service and data-migration boundaries are describedDocumented
Source ownership is documented; migrate backend data and connected services separately.
Data-event automations are documentedRecorded Uvilno check
Bounded record effects and notifications execute in the triggering record transaction; arbitrary server code, email and network actions are outside this rules engine.
A bounded runtime repair has been checked without customer usageRecorded Uvilno check
A reproduced native-static runtime fault was repaired and rechecked without customer usage. This bounded path is rate-limited and does not cover every engine error.
Comparable evidence for these conditions is not recorded here.
Inspect conditions3 unmeasured
Some direct visual edits have a documented no-usage pathUnmeasured
No-usage visual-edit terms have not been established here; absence of a recorded check is not a paid-only claim.
A bounded runtime repair has been checked without customer usageUnmeasured
The same injected fault and actual customer usage ledger have not been inspected on this product.
A previous saved state can be restored without model generationUnmeasured
A matched restore and usage-ledger check has not been run here; existing source-control features are described in the product comparison.
Multi-page & interactive applications15 possible points
2 of 3 conditions documented
Contract-first route plans and reusable modules support multi-page frontends; saved legacy and eligible Next.js projects retain their respective runtimes.
Inspect conditions1 unmeasured
Multiple application or site pages are documentedDocumented
Contract-first route plans and reusable modules support multi-page frontends; saved legacy and eligible Next.js projects retain their respective runtimes.
An interactive Canvas or game workload has recorded evidenceUnmeasured
An equivalent interactive workload has not been run in this evaluation; this does not imply an inability to build games.
Frame time has been measured on matched hardware and workloadUnmeasured
No matched workload/device frame-time measurement is recorded here.
Comparable overall score
Not measured
Not measured
Drag the slider, use the arrows, or scroll within the table.
Read the proposed scoring and test protocol
Each listed condition has a five-point allocation. This page records evidence, not awarded performance points. “Documented” identifies a stated capability with its requirements. “Recorded Uvilno check” identifies a named first-party fixture; it is not independent comparative testing. “Unmeasured” leaves the condition open. Source-access purchases, annual subscriptions and operating services are different costs.
Code ownership & export cost
Build the same app, obtain its complete source, record the actual purchase, and rebuild on a separate host. Test continued source access and document the backend services that still need migration.
Database, accounts & app AI
Create, edit and remove the same records; reload; repeat with another account; check record permissions; run a real app-AI request and inspect a triggered automation. Record each managed or external dependency.
Targeted edit precision & speed
Apply the same specified changes to matched projects. Compare exact file deltas, verify the rendered target and unchanged routes, and record end-to-end timings including verification. Publish failures as well as successes.
No-usage editing & recovery
Make the same direct edit and introduce the same reproducible fault. Inspect actual usage ledgers, repair limits and saved-version behavior. A limited free path must not be described as unlimited free coding.
Multi-page & interactive applications
Build and navigate the same route plan, exercise state across pages, then measure frame time and input response on named devices. Framework support or an attractive screenshot does not establish a universal 60 FPS result.
A published 4–8 second edit claim needs timing data. A 60 FPS claim needs a named workload, device and frame-time record. Neither is inferred from feature availability, code export or a screenshot. The recorded checks and open evaluation protocol describe the current measurement boundary.
The full-stack decision.
Key takeaway, October 2026. Uvilno combines typed hosted data, app AI and bounded transactional automations with a permanent $4.99 source unlock. Choose it when that frontend-and-managed-services contract fits your app; compare Base44's runtime, service limits and handoff against the same requirements.
Where Base44 fits. Choose Base44 when an integrated app platform with its own data dashboard, hosted backend, access controls and scheduled or event-driven workflows suits your operating model.
Where Uvilno fits. Choose Uvilno for a chat-and-preview workflow with declared collections, real app AI, transactional data rules, explicit context mentions and a permanent $4.99 source entitlement per project.
Both offer source handoff and managed backend services. Exporting files does not itself migrate records, identities, credentials or the hosted services those files call. Compare the actual exit plan, not a claim of universal zero lock-in.
24 details that change the decision.
Feature summaries reflect the linked documentation. “Requires configuration” is a responsibility to plan for, not a claim that the other product cannot do it.
Compare products
Uvilno and Base44: 24 documented product, pricing and architecture criteria
What to compare
Uvilno
Base44
Primary job
Conversation-led websites and data-backed frontend apps, isolated preview and source handoff.
Integrated AI app building, hosted backend and data management. [1]
Paid entry plan
Plus $10/month; individual source unlock $4.99 once per project.
Scheduled, data-event and connector triggers; workflows are replacing automations. [5]
Role views and authorization
Guest/Member/Admin previews change presentation only; real visitor permissions remain server-enforced.
App access and role settings; data permissions remain a separate security configuration. [4]
Focused edit context
@file, @page, @db and inspected-element references guide bounded source retrieval with a repo map.
Base Code edits connected repositories with branch previews and commit history. [2]
Repair and interaction cost
Mapped visual edits cost 0% usage. Limited reproduced static-runtime repairs are platform-funded; ordinary AI edits are metered.
Building and live integration work use distinct message/integration credit allowances. [1]
Drag the slider, use the arrows, or scroll within the table.
Uvilno source: plans and source entitlement, with implementation boundaries described on this page. Always review the actual exported project and configured services.
What was actually verified.
Uvilno's October 27 integration run exercised real hosted services with a code-authored fixture. It was not an independently scored CRM-generation contest or a test of Base44. We publish the boundary so a passing SDK check cannot be mistaken for a universal build-completion rate.
Compare products
Uvilno integration observations; competitor results were not measured
Check
Uvilno: observed result
Base44
Saved data
A task was persisted through the actual SDK and recovered after an iframe reload.
Not measured in this run. Official capability documentation is linked separately.
Database effects
Task creation wrote an activity record and notification in the same transaction.
Not measured in this run. Official capability documentation is linked separately.
Account boundaries
Guest/Member/Admin view changes preserved the real visitor and creator identities.
Not measured in this run. Official capability documentation is linked separately.
Targeted recovery
A reproduced static ReferenceError was repaired in app.js and browser-checked without a customer usage-ledger entry.
Not measured in this run. Official capability documentation is linked separately.
Drag the slider, use the arrows, or scroll within the table.
Real free-model text and JSON app inference also passed locally; the production replay verified persistence, automations and isolation without additional inference. No cross-vendor latency, aesthetic score, completion percentage or total operating cost was measured. Read the machine-readable evidence and methodology.
Look beyond the first preview.
Compare the data lifecycle, not just a table
Base44 includes hosted entities and data management. Uvilno declares typed collections in data/schema.json and exposes actual records through App Data. For either product, test create, update and delete, reload the page, then repeat with another visitor account. A table that looks populated is not evidence that ownership rules or persistence are correct. Uvilno's preview personas change presentation, not real account permissions.
Workflows have different execution boundaries
Base44 documents scheduled, data-event and connector-triggered automation, with workflows replacing its automation interface. Uvilno's current rules are narrower: bounded record changes and in-app notifications execute atomically with the triggering collection mutation. Uvilno rules do not run uploaded server JavaScript, send email or make arbitrary network calls. Choose the execution model your workflow actually needs.
A fair ownership comparison includes the backend
Base44 explicitly advertises code ownership and GitHub source export; presenting it as unable to export would be inaccurate. Uvilno offers a $4.99 permanent source entitlement per project, with included unlocks on subscriptions. That is a source-access purchase, not an annual hosting or database bill. In both cases, verify the exported frontend, its licenses, authentication configuration, data export and any provider dependencies before migrating.
Build your annual budget.
Published plan prices are a starting point. Add the costs your actual website needs; this is a budget worksheet, not a price quote or a measured savings claim.
Your 12-month worksheet
Uvilno$59.88
Base44$192.00
Uvilno subscription
$0.00
Uvilno additional source unlocks
$59.88
Uvilno extra usage/services budget
$0.00
Uvilno hosting/domain budget
$0.00
Base44 subscription
$192.00
Base44 extra usage/services
$0.00
Base44 extra hosting/domain
$0.00
Zero in an optional field means that cost is excluded from this worksheet. It does not mean unlimited or free generation, provider usage, hosting or domains. Taxes, currency conversion and labor are excluded.
Source unlocks persist. This worksheet models new projects at an even monthly pace; Plus's two included unlocks must be used in their paid month. Existing unlocked sites do not require another unlock.
Configured monthly AI capacity: Pro is 2.5× Plus; Ultra is 5× Pro. These are usage-capacity ratios, not a guaranteed number of builds.
Starter is displayed at $16/month billed annually ($192 upfront). Builder, which lists GitHub integration, is $40/month billed annually ($480 upfront). The captured offer uses annual billing. Monthly checkout, credit consumption, integration quotas and any third-party charges must be checked separately; Starter is not the GitHub-export comparison plan. Pricing checked 2026-10-27. See the official pricing source.
Questions before you choose.
Is Base44 a platform with no code export?
No. Base44 advertises source ownership and two-way GitHub export, with GitHub integration listed on Builder and higher plans. Check the current plan and how its managed backend is configured before choosing a migration path.
Does Uvilno's $4.99 unlock include a year of hosting and app AI?
No. It permanently unlocks one project's source. Generation remains metered, app AI uses the creator's allowance, and exported managed services still need a running service or replacement. Add hosting and operational costs separately.
Can I switch Uvilno's preview to Admin to grant permissions?
No. Guest, Member and Admin preview views are presentation tests. The actual isolated visitor identity and server-side record authorization remain unchanged.
Which Base44 price is used in the annual calculator?
The Starter annual offer is $192 upfront. Builder is separately displayed at $480 annually and lists GitHub integration. The calculator models the named plan, not the cheapest route to every feature, and excludes hosting overages and third-party services unless you enter them.
Does Uvilno include publishing or unlimited generation?
Publish Studio can serve an explicitly published version, and entitled projects can connect a verified custom domain. Every plan still has finite AI usage and service limits. A permanent source unlock grants source access, not unlimited hosting or generation. External hosting and managed-service migration need separate planning; payments currently use test workflows.
Try your own brief.
A product comparison can narrow the options. Your own content, constraints and review decide the fit.
The brief is preloaded for you to review. AI generation starts only when you send it. Included usage is limited; source access requires unlock.
The sources behind the details.
Official vendor documentation checked on 2026-10-27. Billing conflicts and unavailable prices are disclosed above. Uvilno prices follow our current plan configuration; our implementation is the source for its documented boundaries.