AI builder migration checker.
Keep the working parts. Identify the services that need a deliberate migration. Prepare a rebuilding brief, attach a public visual reference, or open Uvilno's actual repository import flow.
Start with Base44's actual exit path.
Advertises ownership and two-way GitHub source export; plan conditions apply. Source ownership is documented; migrate backend data and connected services separately.
Review the sourced comparisonWhat can move.
- Source and licensed assets you own and are authorized to export.
- Documented page journeys, field definitions and supported interactions.
- A public visual reference with permission; it informs a new design, not a copy of private code.
What needs a separate plan.
- Customer data, retention/consent and ownership mapping need an explicit data migration.
- Passwords, sessions, OAuth apps, API keys and payment accounts do not transfer with a source ZIP.
- Hosted backend operations, jobs, secrets and production deployment require a reviewed replacement or continued service contract.
No application is imported or built until you explicitly complete the chosen flow. The checker does not read your current account, records, source or credentials.
Questions before you choose.
Can Uvilno automatically move my customers and passwords?
No. A source import does not migrate customer records, passwords, payment accounts or provider secrets. Export approved data separately, plan ownership and consent, and verify any replacement service before launch.
Can Base44 projects export source?
Base44 documents source ownership and GitHub workflows with plan conditions. Its hosted backend is a separate dependency. The checker compares the actual exit path rather than claiming that Base44 has no export.
Does copying a site's style copy its application?
No. A public URL can supply a visual reference for a new brief. It cannot transfer private source, database records, authentication or ownership of another business's content. Use references you have permission to use.
Keep the next step concrete.
Review the SDK and service contract, compare the current plans, or try another engineering tool. Generating an app and operating it are separate decisions.
Check the architecture. Compare the tradeoffs.
Follow the data model, account boundary and source handoff before choosing a builder.
Compare builders
Plan a full-stack app
Review the evidence
- Full-stack builder buyer’s guide
- Four full-stack workflows compared
- Plan data, sign-in and checkout
- Machine-readable evidence and methodology
- Remixable app blueprints
- Direct answers to builder questions
- Free planning and migration tools
- 108 full-stack engineering prompts
- Public SDK documentation
- Recorded checks and open evaluation protocol
- RSS updates for guides and comparisons